In an era of increasing environmental concerns, the concept of carbon credits has gained prominence as a mechanism to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainability. In farming, carbon credits offer a potential avenue for agricultural practices to contribute to carbon neutrality. However, amidst the allure of sustainability claims, the phenomenon of greenwashing – occurring when a company proclaims engagement in positive actions to achieve sustainability, while still being involved in environmentally harmful processes or activities – raises questions about the true impact and effectiveness of carbon credits. In this article, we will examine carbon credits for farming, their potential benefits, limitations, and the need to navigate through greenwashing.
Understanding Carbon Credits
Carbon credits represent a financial instrument that aims to incentivise emission reduction activities. According to Investopedia, ‘Carbon credits, also known as carbon offsets, are permits that allow the owner to emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. One credit permits the emission of one ton of carbon dioxide or the equivalent in other greenhouse gases.’
They are considered as a financial instrument because companies are allowed to pollute to a certain limit. If they pollute less than it is allowed, they can sell unneeded credits to another company that needs them.
Farmers can earn carbon credits by adopting practices that sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, such as conservation tillage, cover cropping, agroforestry, or renewable energy generation. These credits can then be traded on carbon markets, allowing entities to offset their own emissions by purchasing these credits from farmers.
The Promise of Sustainability
Proponents of carbon credits for farming argue that they offer a pathway towards sustainable agriculture. By rewarding farmers for adopting environmentally friendly practices, carbon credits incentivise the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, enhance soil health, and promote biodiversity. Moreover, these credits have the potential to generate additional income for farmers, fostering economic resilience.
While the concept of carbon credits appears promising, the phenomenon of greenwashing may trigger considerable challenges. As mentioned above, Greenwashing happens when a company makes an environmental claim about something the organisation is doing that is meant to promote a sense of environmental impact that, in reality, doesn't exist. In the context of carbon credits for farming, greenwashing may occur when carbon credits are awarded for practices having minimal or questionable environmental impact. The sustainability claims associated with carbon credits and the actual outcomes achieved on the ground are not consistent.
We should not forget that the aim of carbon credits is not income, but clean environment and low emissions. The possibility to sell extra or generated carbon credits is intended as a motivation to raise responsibility and encourage real actions to prevent emissions.
To address the risks of greenwashing, transparency and accountability are paramount. It is crucial that farmers, carbon credit providers, and consumers have access to reliable information and verifiable data. Sound verification mechanisms and certification standards must be in place to ensure that carbon credits are allocated based on scientifically rigorous methodologies and genuine emissions reductions. Stakeholders should actively engage in due diligence, scrutinising the credibility of carbon credit programs and the claims made by agricultural entities.
Our team can support you with setting the carbon credit programme. Just press the button “Let’s chat!” to send us your request.